>>>>> Martin Maechler writes:
>>>>> "KH" == Kurt Hornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> on Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:04:40 +0200 writes:
>>>>> Peter Dalgaard writes:
>>> David James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>> Calls of the form data(package = pkg) inside a function
>>>> incorrectly fail ("pkg" is a local variable). For instance,
>>>>
>>>> foo <- function(pkg) data(package = pkg)
>>>> foo("base")
>>>> Error in .find.package(package, lib.loc, verbose = verbose) :
>>>> none of the packages were found
>>> This is pretty much unavoidable if you want a function to accept
>>> unquoted names. It's not in principle different from
>>> women <- "airquality"
>>> data(women)
>>> not being equivalent to data("airquality"). Some functions (library(),
>>> require(), demo()) have a character.only argument to prevent it, and I
>>> suppose we should consider putting it on help() and data() as well.
KH> Or get rid of non-standard evaluation and educate users to use quoted
KH> strings where strings should be used.
> and infuriate those who know and used the S language for more than 15
> years, where help(help) has always worked?
I would think that these users either click themselves to happiness, or
use ? because it is shorter.
> Definitely not worth the pain (I *know* I'd hear ... comments from
> them!)! I'd go for adding `character.only'.
Actually, I do think it is worth the pain. The way I understand it, we
have a strategic decision to gradually eliminate non-standard eval.
-k
______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
