Kurt Hornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > (Argh. The test builds of 1.8.0 were actually against tcl8.0, but
> > apparently our testing procedures skip any attempt to load the dynlib.
> > Automated tests of tcl/tk are difficult because Tk will protest if
> > there is no X display.)
>
> On systems which have Xvfb, this is not a problem.
>
> The daily package checker uses this, for example.
Hmm it is more tricky than that it seems. I see
comparing 'stepfun-Ex.Rout' to 'stepfun-Ex.Rout.prev' ... OK
running code in 'tcltk-Ex.R' ... OK
comparing 'tcltk-Ex.Rout' to 'tcltk-Ex.Rout.prev' ... OK
collecting examples for package 'ts' ...
make[5]: Entering directory `/e7/pd/r-devel/BUILD/src/library'
However,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] BUILD]$ tail tests/Examples/tcltk-Ex.Rout
> postscript("tcltk-Examples.ps")
> assign("par.postscript", par(no.readonly = TRUE), env = .CheckExEnv)
> options(contrasts = c(unordered = "contr.treatment", ordered = "contr.poly"))
> require('tcltk') || q()
Loading required package: tcltk
Error in dyn.load(x, as.logical(local), as.logical(now)) :
unable to load shared library
"/e7/pd/r-devel/BUILD/library/tcltk/libs/tcltk.so":
/e7/pd/r-devel/BUILD/library/tcltk/libs/tcltk.so: undefined symbol:
RTcl_ActivateConsole
Error in runHook(".onLoad", env, package.lib, package) :
.onLoad failed
I.e. the seeming pass of make check is really just reflecting the fact
that I got the same catastrophic failure as last time I ran it...
Is there a better way?
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) FAX: (+45) 35327907
______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
