True, it is not a bug, it is a meta-bug. You don't see many of
those about.

I'll shut up about this now.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Dalgaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 November 2003 16:50
> To: Simon Fear
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Rd] address for bug reports? (PR#5171)
> 
> 
> Security Warning: 
> If you are not sure an attachment is safe to open please contact  
> Andy on x234. There are 0 attachments with this message. 
> ________________________________________________________________ 
>  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> > bug.report() tells me to email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], whereas
> > the Web site http://www.r-project.org/ points me to 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > Which should I believe?  
> 
> Either should work, I believe. The latter is more direct, but the
> former in principle independent of the location of the repository.
> 
> However: This is not a bug in R, and no reason to add to the already
> considerable burden of manually moving stuff from "incoming" to
> "trashcan" (twice)!
> 
> (Doug: the aliases on Franz do look a bit dodgy though.)
> 
> -- 
>    O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Blegdamsvej 3  
>   c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     2200 Cph. N   
>  (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph: 
> (+45) 35327918
> ~~~~~~~~~~ - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])             FAX: 
> (+45) 35327907
>  
 
Simon Fear 
Senior Statistician 
Syne qua non Ltd 
Tel: +44 (0) 1379 644449 
Fax: +44 (0) 1379 644445 
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
web: http://www.synequanon.com 
  
Number of attachments included with this message: 0 
  
This message (and any associated files) is confidential and\...{{dropped}}

______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to