On 26-Nov-2003, Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | >>>>> " Kurt" == Kurt Hornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | >>>>> on Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:05:42 +0100 writes: | | Kurt> Right. In any case, an explicit glob() function | Kurt> seems preferable to me ... | | Good idea! | | More than 12 years ago, I had a similar one, and wrote a | "pat2grep()" {pattern to grep regular expression} function | --- for S-plus on Unix --- which I have now renamed to glob2regexp(): | -- still not really usable outside unix (or windows with the | 'sed' tool in the path), nor perfect, but maybe a good start: | | sys <- function(...) system(paste(..., sep = "")) | | glob2regexp <- function(pattern) | { | ## Purpose: Change "ls pattern" to "grep regular expression" pattern. | ## ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ## Author: Martin Maechler ETH Zurich, ~ 1991 | sys("echo '", pattern, "'| sed ", | "'s/\\./\\\\./g;s/*/.*/g;s/?/./g; s/^/^/;s/$/$/; s/\\.\\*\\$$//'") | }
It seems to me that using this approach to implement a proper glob() function would be more work than using the glob code that is available as part of bash, which I think will allow you to handle much more complex patterns, including [xyz] {a,b,c} etc. jwe ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel