That appears to have been garbled en route.
Could you please take a look at the FAQ and submit
a reproducible example along the lines suggested there.
On the face of it this appears to be a bug report on Excel 2000,
but you may be using an R addin without mentioning it.
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: g. schiessler
> Version: 1.8.1
> OS: Windows 2000 Pro
> Submission from: (NULL) (24.229.106.55)
>
>
> Appears to be memory leak with
> =RApply("qnorm",K56)*-1 function
Is that line really correct? If so, what does it have to do with R?
> from within Excel 2000.
> Have spreadsheet with between
> 100 and 500 of above references.
> When spreadsheet first opened
> system using about 200MB but
> very quickly grows to over 600MB
> and appears to be unlimited.
> Is there another way to run qnorm
> from within Excel with less memory?
>
> ______________________________________________
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
>
--
Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
