On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I got problems using an objects returned from arima
> (in KalmanSmooth(my.ts, ModArima$model), because
> my.ts showed up to have storage mode "integer" (is.integer(my.ts was
> TRUE).
>
> Should storage.mode() of a ts be allowed to be integer,
We had a debate about that a while back. Seems the majority opinion is
that a ts can have any atomic mode (numeric, integer, complex, logical,
character), but that most of the analysis code assumes a ts object is
numeric. So arima() contains
x <- as.ts(x)
if(!is.numeric(x))
stop("`x' must be numeric")
storage.mode(x) <- "double" # a precaution
!
> should ts() someplace say storage.mode(ts.out) <- "double", or
> maybe inside arima()
> storage.mode(x) <- "double"
> storage.mode(xreg) <- "double"
> ?
Yes, sort of (xreg=NULL cannot have storage mode "double"), and those
coercions _are_ already inside arima.
I think the issue is that you need to be more careful using KalmanSmooth:
my.ts would not have been returned by arima(). The Kalman* functions are
internal workhorses and there is a `Warning' about precisely this on their
help page. I suggest you write a tsSmooth method and use that rather than
calling KalmanSmooth directly.
--
Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
