>>>>> "PD" == Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> on 22 Apr 2004 00:11:00 +0200 writes:
PD> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> This is R1.9.0, windows XP
>>
>> I run across the following:
>>
>> It is admittedly silly, but it shouldn't segfault:
>>
>> test <- list(y=1:100, x=rep(NaN, 100))
>> approx(test, xout=rep(NaN, 10))
>>
>> Bombs!
PD> Yup. Sanity check needed on entrance to approx1. I suppose that
PD> if (!n) return NaN;
PD> should do the trick.
indeed! s/NaN/R_NaN/
Will commit for R-patched {future 1.9.1}.
Martin
______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
