>>>>> "BDR" == Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> on Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:11:39 +0100 (BST) writes:
BDR> On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Martin Maechler wrote: >> >>>>> "BDR" == Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>>>> on Tue, 10 Aug 2004 05:47:28 +0100 (BST) writes: >> BDR> On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Ross Ihaka wrote: >> >> Rob Hyndman wrote: >> >> > When part of a time series is extracted, the time series component is >> >> > lost. e.g., >> >> > x <- ts(1:10) >> >> > x[1:4] >> >> > >> >> > It would be nice if there was a subsetting function [.ts to avoid this >> >> > problem. However, it is beyond my R-coding ability to produce such a >> >> > thing. Is someone willing to do it? >> BDR> There is a [.ts, in src/library/stats/R/ts.R, and it is documented BDR> (?"[.ts"). >> >> >> Have you had a look at "window"? The problem with "[" >> >> its that it can produce non-contiguous sets of values. >> BDR> Yes. >> >> indeed. window() is what we have been advocation for a long >> time now ... (but see below). >> BDR> If you look in the sources for [.ts you will see, BDR> commented, the code that was once there to handle cases BDR> where the index was evenly spaced. But it was removed BDR> long ago in favour of window(). I tried to consult the BDR> logs, but it seems that in the shift from CVS to SVN BDR> recently I can't get at them. I think the rationale BDR> was that x[ind] should always produce an object of the BDR> same class. >> >> well, that can't have been the only rationale since now >> x[ind] is *not* of the same class - when the "ts" property is >> lost in any case. BDR> `always of the same class' : for all (non-trivial) values of ind. aah! please excuse my mis-interpretation of meaning "same class as original x". Martin ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel