"M. Edward Borasky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just got R-2.0.0 alpha running on my Gentoo Linux system. The only > issue I had was that if I do "--with-lapack" in the "configure", "make > check" fails very early. Once I removed that option, "make check-all" > passed. I have both "blas-atlas" and "lapack-atlas" installed on my > system. The Atlas version is 3.6.0.
Hmm, but would the linker know where to find them? Also, there could be an issue with dynamic vs. static libraries. Any configure experts around? > There were a few warnings in the logs of "make check-all". Does anyone > want to see the log files? Not all of them, for every build... I think most of the warnings are in principle known by the respective authors, but a small "executive summary" might have some nag factor value. > I'm going to go ahead and test 2.0.0 with > some of the simple things I do. I don't do anything very complicated > with it, so it may not shake out anything. If there's anything > Gentoo-specific you want me to run, please let me know. I'm on the > Gentoo "science" mailing list and I can get their attention fairly > easily. -- O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3 c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) FAX: (+45) 35327907 ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
