On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 12:26:45PM +0200, Martin Maechler wrote: > >>>>> "GB" == Göran Broström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>> on Mon, 20 Sep 2004 11:00:57 +0200 writes: > > GB> On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 10:43:44AM +0200, Martin Maechler wrote: > >> >>>>> "GB" == Göran Broström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >>>>> on Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:51:49 +0200 writes: >
> We do encourage not using "." for new function names because of > the reason above, but it's definitely not a requirement. > In the case where 'foo' is an S3 generic function name, > we however recommend quite strongly not to use > 'foo.bar' > as function name since it looks "too much" like an S3 method. > Is this the case for you? No. > > GB> But how is this problem connected to using C/Fortran code? > > only via "namespace magic". Yes, magic is the word: I got 'R CMD check' and NAMESPACE working by cleaning 'R' from '*.R~' files and 'src' from old '.o' files and an old 'eha.so' (from 1.x.x something)! Another thought: Since I really haven't used S3 methods so far, should I go for S4 methods directly? Göran -- Göran Broström tel: +46 90 786 5223 Department of Statistics fax: +46 90 786 6614 Umeå University http://www.stat.umu.se/egna/gb/ SE-90187 Umeå, Sweden e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
