> From: Duncan Murdoch [snip] > For 2.1.0, would it be reasonable to extend debug() the way ? was > extended? E.g. allow > > debug(plot(x)) > > and have the debugging flag be set on the appropriate function, > whatever and wherever it happens to be? There's some ambiguity with > S3 methods (did you want to debug the generic or the method?), but I > think defaulting to debugging of the method would be reasonable. (And > I think ? needs to be extended to handle S3 methods too, but that's a > different question.) > > Duncan Murdoch
The ambiguity could be quite real. I have a formula method that just does preprocessing, then call the default method. What do the debugger do then? I've run into situations that I wanted to debug both of them, but not at the same time. I just do what Gabor had suggested: debug(namespace:::function). Works for me. Best, Andy ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
