This is easy: x <- sort(x) should be first (as that drops NAs). Fixed in R-patched.
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004, stefano iacus wrote: > I would add that some action has to be taken in presence of missing > values, i.e. > > > x <- c(1,2,2,4,7, NA, 10,12, 15,20) > > ecdf(x) > Error in xy.coords(x, y) : x and y lengths differ > > stefano > > On Oct 17, 2004, at 8:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Full_Name: Martin Frith > > Version: R-2.0.0 > > OS: linux-gnu > > Submission from: (NULL) (134.160.83.73) > > > > > > I have large vectors containing 100,000 to 20,000,000 numbers. > > However, they > > only contain a few hundred *distinct* numbers (e.g. positive integers > > < 200). > > When I do ecdf(v), it either runs out of memory, or it succeeds, but > > when I plot > > the ecdf with postscript, the output is unnecessarily bloated because > > the same > > lines get redrawn many times. The complexity of ecdf should depend on > > how many > > distinct numbers there are, not how many total numbers. > > > > This is my first bug report, so forgive me if I've done something > > stupid! > > > > ______________________________________________ > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > > > > ______________________________________________ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > > -- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595 ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
