[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I just found that rank() has a 'decreasing' argument that is not documented in
> its
> help page. I checked my version of 2.0.0 (original release hence unpatched)
> and
> it is not documented there. For curiousity I also went back to version 1.8.1
> and
> checked the function (not the documentation)and at that point rank() had not
> yet
> acquired the 'decreasing' argument.
>
> It's ironic as I was wishing that rank() had a decreasing option like
> sort does, and then I found that it already does.
Eh????
I have
> rank
function (x, na.last = TRUE, ties.method = c("average", "first",
"random", "max", "min"))
{....
And we do have QC tools that work very hard to ensure that all
arguments are documented!
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) FAX: (+45) 35327907
______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
