Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> G�ran Brostr�m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Reading about 'R_max_col' in "Writing R extensions", Version
> > 2.1.0,(2005-01-03), I find:
> >
> > "Given the nr by nc matrix matrix in row ("FORTRAN") order, ..."
> >
> > Looks like a contradiction to me, since FORTRAN stores matrices
> > columnwise. So is this a documentation bug?
>
> Hmmmm. Maybe. FORTRAN order is known as column-*major* order. The row
> index varies most quickly, so the question is whether "row order" may
> have have some merit. Anyone have the terminology straight?
Gordon Smyth didn't think "row order" made sense either, so I've
changed "row" to "column-major" for r-devel.
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) FAX: (+45) 35327907
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
