For example, Chambers, Cleveland et al. (1983), Graphical Methods
for Data Analysis, p. 15 Fig. 2.4:
"Stamford" <-
c(66, 52, NA, NA, NA, NA, 49, 64, 68, 26, 86, 52, 43, 75, 87,
188, 118, 103, 82, 71, 103, 240, 31, 40, 47, 51, 31, 47, 14,
NA, 71, 61, 47, NA, 196, 131, 173, 37, 47, 215, 230, NA, 69,
98, 125, 94, 72, 72, 125, 143, 192, NA, 122, 32, 114, 32, 23,
71, 38, 136, 169, 152, 201, 134, 206, 92, 101, 119, 124, 133,
83, NA, 60, 124, 142, 124, 64, 75, 103, NA, 46, 68, NA, 87, 27,
NA, 73, 59, 119, 64, NA, 111, 80, 68, 24, 24, 82, 100, 55, 91,
87, 64, NA, NA, 170, NA, 86, 202, 71, 85, 122, 155, 80, 71, 28,
212, 80, 24, 80, 169, 174, 141, 202, 113, 38, 38, 28, 52, 14,
38, 94, 89, 99, 150, 146, 113, 38, 66, 38, 80, 80, 99, 71, 42,
52, 33, 38, 24, 61, 108, 38, 28, NA)
xco <- ppoints(na.omit(Stamford))
yco <- sort(Stamford)
plot(xco, yco,
pch = 20,
xlab = "FRACTION OF DATA",
ylab = "QUANTILES OF OZONE DATA",
cex = 0.6)
Another minor remark concerning ?ppoints. It says:
n: either the number of points generate or a vector of
observations. ^^^^^
As you see, that does not line up, but the typo has been fixed.
Thank you for your answer (and fix).
Tobias
--
Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595