You too have not give an reproducible example!

If you have a corrupt data frame, the function may fail, which is what happened in the PR# you quote.

Please note: you should not be calling as.matrix.data.frame, but as.matrix.

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Gorjanc Gregor wrote:

Hello R developers.

I encountered the same problem as Uwe Ligges with as.matrix.data.frame()
in bug reports 3229 and 3242 - under section not-reproducible.

Example I have is:

tmp
                            level 2100-D
1       biological_process unknown     NA
2                 cellular process  -5.88
3                      development  -8.42
4            physiological process  -6.55
5 regulation of biological process     NA
6                 viral life cycle     NA

str(tmp)
`data.frame':   6 obs. of  2 variables:
$ level      : Factor w/ 6 levels "biological_..",..: 1 2 3 4 5 6
$ 2100-D_mean:`data.frame':    6 obs. of  1 variable:
 ..$ 2100-D: num  NA -5.88 -8.42 -6.55 NA NA

I think you have a data frame column in a data frame, and that cannot be made directly into a matrix. It's the steps that got you here that are the problem.


as.matrix.data.frame(tmp)
Error in as.matrix.data.frame(tmp) : dim<- : dims [product 6] do not
match the length of object [7]

The error associated with this is comming up at the end of function
as.matrix.data.frame where it is used:

   dim(X) <- c(n, length(X)/n)

?dim says
    'dim' has a method for 'data.frame's, which returns the length of
    the 'row.names' attribute of 'x' and the length of 'x' (the
    numbers of "rows" and "columns").

This part is ok. The problem is with X, which is "intensively"
modified through the function. Before this (dim(X) <- ...) call
X in my case is:

x <- tmp
"code from as.matrix.data.frame down to dim(X) <- ..."
X
[[1]]
[1] "biological_process unknown"

[[2]]
[1] "cellular process"

[[3]]
[1] "development"

[[4]]
[1] "physiological process"

[[5]]
[1] "regulation of biological process"

[[6]]
[1] "viral life cycle"

[[7]]
[1]    NA -5.88 -8.42 -6.55    NA    NA

So we can see, that X is somehow destroyed - the first and second
column of tmp differ. For dim command this should really be one
long vector. So the problem lies in line

   X <- unlist(X, recursive = FALSE, use.names = FALSE)

where it should be

   X <- unlist(X, recursive = TRUE, use.names = FALSE)
                              ^^^^

I have checked source code for that function from R as well as
in R-devel sources. I was not succesfull in reproducing the above
with the data frame bellow though. It did not report any problems
with old as.matrix.data.frame. There must be some trick with
first column in my data. So I am quite sure my suggestion is
OK.

tmp1 <- data.frame(level=c("A A", "B B"), x=c(NA, -5.8))

--
Lep pozdrav / With regards,
   Gregor GORJANC

---------------------------------------------------------------
University of Ljubljana
Biotechnical Faculty       URI: http://www.bfro.uni-lj.si
Zootechnical Department    email: gregor.gorjanc <at> bfro.uni-lj.si
Groblje 3                  tel: +386 (0)1 72 17 861
SI-1230 Domzale            fax: +386 (0)1 72 17 888
Slovenia

______________________________________________
R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel



-- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595

______________________________________________
R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to