On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Full_Name: Chris Spencer
Version: 2.0.1
OS: Linux
Submission from: (NULL) (163.1.211.93)


Dear R team,

I realise that the following is a bit unsafe (the combination of doubles and
integers), however I wondered whether the following behaviour is expected:

#Test R
test <- vector(length=100000);
for(i in 1:100000){temp = i/1000; test[i] = (i == temp*1000);}
table(test);
test
FALSE  TRUE
1472 98528

Certainly. You might even expect worse behaviour than that.

temp can be exactly represented in double precision only when i is a multiple of 125. Depending on exactly how the computations are done and how many extra guard digits are carried you could get FALSE for nearly all i not a multiple of 125. The fact that you get TRUE 98% of the time is better accuracy than you should expect.


-thomas

______________________________________________
R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to