[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: Georg Roth
> Version: R.2.0.1.for Windows
> OS: Win98
> Submission from: (NULL) (134.95.43.165)
You have submitted two bug reports with two different PR#. Please don't
do that!
> Using libraries "spatstat" and "sm" on R.2.0.1. under Windows 98
You are talking about *packages*.
> bug 1)
> the libraries "spatstat" and "sm" are not properly identified by the
> "library()" command on R.2.0.1. (R for Windows98). the libraryname is shown
> in
> upper case ("SPATSTAT") although the original name is in lower case
> ("spatstat")
So the *package* name is shown in uppercase?
> and no good commentary is available - instead the returned commentary in both
> cases
> reads "**No title available (pre-2.0.0.install?)".
Are these the most recent version of the packages? Version numbers? Are
these compiled for R-2.0.1? Did you download the binary versions from
CRAN for R-2.0.x? Or do you use self-compiled ones?
Please be more precise when submitting bug reports!
> i suppose the following problem to be connected with the first bug:
>
> bug 2)
> it is impossible to load the two the libraries "spatstat" and "sm" with the
> command "library(libraryname)". using different versions like
> "library("SPATSTAT")", "library("spatstat")", or "library(spatstat)" and the
> like.
And what does the error message (that one for "library("spaatstat"))
tell you? Please be more precise when submitting bug reports!
> the same copies of the two libraries work fine in R.2.0.1. on a Windows2000 PC
Are you really sure?
I guess that the copies are NOT identical, maybe same version number,
but at least one (the Win98 one) compiled for R < 2.0.0.
I do not have any DOS based Windows version around to test, so we need
the details.
Uwe Ligges
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
______________________________________________
R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
