On 23/03/2005, at 7:04 PM, Martin Maechler wrote:
I pretty much entirely agree with your points, Bill, and would
tend to declare that this Apple library is ``broken''
for building a correctly running R.

Thanks for that.

Let me ask one question I've been wondering about now for a
while:

  Did you run "make check" after building R,
  and "make check" ran to completion without an error?

The thought occurred to me as well. So I tried to run it, but I could not get it to run. It was a couple of months ago I built this version of R, and maybe I trashed something. Time ran out, and I had to go and earn a living.


I will try again, and report the results.

If yes (which I doubt quite a bit), there *is* a bug in R's quality control / quality assurance tools -- and I would want to add a check for the misbehavior you've mentioned.

I would also be surprised if it runs without error.

I don't really understand LAPACK enough. I started reading and trying to work out how to produce test cases which I could submit to Apple as a bug or bugs.

Bill

______________________________________________
R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to