[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The following can't be right,
> first rw2010:
>
> > 1 %% 0.001
> [1] 0.001
>
> Then rw2001:
>
> > 1 %% 0.001
> [1] -2.081668e-17
> >
>
> and the last seems about right.
A negative remainder? I don't think so. Presumably the result comes
from
o %% now warns if its accuracy is likely to be affected by lack
of precision (as in 1e18 %% 11, the unrealistic expectation of
PR#7409), and tries harder to return a value in range when it
is.
So, not a bug.
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) FAX: (+45) 35327907
______________________________________________
R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
