Any idea who did? I have it in my list of quotes and
attributed to you. 

Anon is so boring as a source.

--- Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> I did not write that.
> 
> On Jan 29, 2008 9:05 AM, S Ellison
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>> "Gabor Grothendieck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 29/01/2008 12:35:27
> > >>>
> > > As is common in human affairs, even
> > > the illusion of understanding is preferred to a
> lofty digression
> > upon
> > > why the audience does not understand.
> >
> > Gabor,
> >
> > This should be in fortunes; it is depressingly
> accurate.
> > But it doesn't have to be a lofty digression.
> >
> > S
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
*******************************************************************
> > This email and any attachments are confidential.
> Any u...{{dropped:9}}
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained,
> reproducible code.
>

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to