Hello all,
Following on my question here (
http://www.mail-archive.com/r-help@r-project.org/msg116075.html), I
understand now that when using sort = FALSE the order of the merged data
frame is "unspecified".
But why was it designed this way? Why not keep the original order (when
possible)?
Thanks,
Tal
----------------Contact
Details:-------------------------------------------------------
Contact me: tal.gal...@gmail.com | 972-52-7275845
Read me: www.talgalili.com (Hebrew) | www.biostatistics.co.il (Hebrew) |
www.r-statistics.com (English)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
