Using:
summaryRprof(memory="both")
did the trick, thank you. I had not been using that setting when calling
summaryRprof.
Thanks, Patrick
2010/11/20 Uwe Ligges <lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>
>
>
> On 19.11.2010 21:48, Patrick Leyshock wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to configure Version 2.12.0 or R to do memory profiling.
>>
>> I've reconfigured the code:
>>
>> % ./compile --enable-memory-profiling=YES
>>
>> and verified that it's configured correctly by examining the output. I
>> then
>> rebuild R:
>>
>> % make
>>
>> Then I fire up R and run a script, using Rprof with the memory-profiling
>> switch set to TRUE:
>>
>> Rprof("output", memory.profiling=TRUE);
>> # a bunch of R code
>> Rprof(NULL);
>>
>
>
> Wen I do
>
> summaryRprof(memory="both")
>
> I see an additional column ...
>
> but since you have not said what you tried exactly, we cannot help very
> much.
>
> Uwe Ligges
>
>
>
> When I examine the output, however, using either R CMD Rprof from the
>> shell,
>> or summaryRprof from within R, the output I see is identical to the output
>> I
>> got when I ran R BEFORE I recompiled with memory profiling enabled.
>>
>> Anyone see something that I'm missing?
>>
>> Thanks, Patrick
>>
>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide
>> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>>
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
