I am sure I am opening myself up to looking stupid, but I have two samples
with medians of 613.5 and 189 (difference in location of 424 compared to
the difference suggested from the wilcoxon of 291.5)
> wilcox.test(pipwtCount,pipwdCount, conf.int=TRUE, na.rm=TRUE)
Wilcoxon rank sum test
data: pipwtCount and pipwdCount
W = 822, p-value = 0.01227
alternative hypothesis: true location shift is not equal to 0
95 percent confidence interval:
58 639
sample estimates:
difference in location
291.5
The data is here
> pipwtCount
[1] 532 298 215 1588 38 180 284 376 5349 1024 650 605 1307 6147
21
[16] 453 23 1983 1048 464 2183 1028 1361 163 175 5944 569 622 793
70
[31] 67 1188 248 3010 19 2179 1339 408 113 739 2615 4619
> pipwdCount
[1] 89 384 12 703 2 138 189 383 314 482 96 907 90 1193
154
[16] 305 61 414 4764 1066 121 143 102 174 44 2896 NA 1103 161
199
> median(pipwtCount)
[1] 613.5
> median(pipwdCount,na.rm=T)
[1] 189
> 613.5-189
[1] 424.5
I would appreciate if someone could point out the obvious to me, and explain
why there is such a large discrepancy in the differences in location.
Many thanks,
Graham
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
