No, the point of my question is how to plot the Re and Im parts as two
separate surfaces in one chart.
On 10/14/11 5:46 AM, Eik Vettorazzi wrote:
Hi Carl,
I have no idea what z or f(z) are, but maybe outer will help you:
wireframe(outer(seq(0,5,length.out=50),seq(2,4,length.out=40),function(x,y)sin(x*y)))
cheers.
Am 13.10.2011 23:37, schrieb Carl Witthoft:
Hi all,
I'd like to plot the Real and Imaginary parts of some f(z) as two
different surfaces in wireframe (the row/column axes are the real and
imag axes). I know I can do it by, roughly speaking, something like
plotz<- expand.grid(x={range of Re(z)}, y={range of Im(z), groups=1:2)
plotz$func<-c(Re(f(z),Im(f(z))
wireframe(func~x*y,data=plotz,groups=groups)
But that seems like a clunky way to go, especially if I happen to have
started out with a nice matrix of the f(z) values.
So, is there some simpler way to write the formula in wireframe? I
envision, for a matrix of complex values zmat, pseudocode:
wireframe(c(Re(zmat),Im(zmat), groups=1:2)
-- and yes, I'm fully aware that without a connection between the
'groups' variable and zmat, this won't work as written.
All suggestions (including "read the help file for {some lattice func I
didn't know about} ) greatfully accepted.
Carl
--
-----
Sent from my Cray XK6
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.