thanks
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Greenberg, Jonathan <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Saptarshi: > > There are quite a few parallel mapply's out there -- my recommendation is > to use the foreach package, since it allows you to be flexible in the > parallel backend, and you don't have to write two statements (a sequential > and a parallel statement) -- if a parallel backend is running, it will use > that, otherwise it'll execute in sequential mode. > > --j > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on > behalf of Saptarshi Guha [[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 1:24 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [R] Parallel version of Map(rather, mapply) > > Hello, > I find Map to be nice interface to mapply. However > Map calls mapply which in turn calls mapply via .Internal. > > Is there a parallel version of mapply (like mcapply) or do I need to write > this myself? > > Regards > Saptarshi > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
