On Oct 30, 2013, at 6:04 AM, Jack Tanner wrote: > I'm not sure if this is correct behavior or not, but it seems > counterintuitive > to me: > > dat <- data.frame(id=1:5, let=letters[1:5]) > # A. omits the first row > dat[- 1, ] > > # B. unexpectedly omits ALL rows > dat[- integer(0), ] > > It would be less surprising if there were no rows omitted in the (B) case.
Yes. It is surprising. It is also teh reason why the construction is also not returning what a user might expect: dat[-which(dat$id >5), ] #[1] id let #<0 rows> (or 0-length row.names) (And yes I know that many people never use which with a logical. I'm just not one of those for what I consider good reasons.) `subset` may be preferred, at least for console interaction: subset( dat, !(id >5) ) id let 1 1 a 2 2 b 3 3 c 4 4 d 5 5 e -- David Winsemius Alameda, CA, USA ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
