On 25/11/2013 8:47 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>> I do not see how it can be illegal to download and duplicate the
>> posts, since all the content is licensed under CC BY-SA. I might have
>> missed something there: http://stackexchange.com/legal If that is
>> really the case, I think I will have to reconsider if I should use it
>> any more.
>
> I'm not a lawyer, but I see claims restricting users to "personal use".
Neither am I, but I don't see any claims about personal use in the
"Subscriber Content" section, which is what concerns content that
other people have uploaded to stackoverflow. As Yihui says, all
questions and answers (as opposed to the stuff written by
stackoverflow the company) is licensed with
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/.
I suspect you'll find that the mailing list is in more of a grey area
since authors own the copyright to their posts and haven't agreed to
any redistribution (apart from what is obvious in signing up for a
mailing list).
I like the colour grey. It means that the mailing list is archived in
lots of places. SO isn't.
Duncan Murdoch
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
