On 23 Sep 2015, at 02:33 , Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.dun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't see why this puzzles you. A simple explanation is that Urkund > is incompetent. That much I figured. What I was puzzled about was _how_ it was being incompetent. Also how it could be so in a way that wouldn't be obvious to the professor in question. I haven't used Urkund, but people are pushing it here at CBS too. If they start automating it on electronic submissions in maths and stats, some interesting things could happen. I have used iThenticate as a journal editor, and that one will tell you word for word which sections of text are identical to which sections of text in which other documents. -- Peter Dalgaard, Professor, Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Office: A 4.23 Email: pd....@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
