> > SQL, for example, generally takes the view that any
> > expression involving 'missing' is 'missing'.
>
> Well, then SQL gets it wrong.
Well, that's a view. But paraphrasing an R Turner from a few lines away in the
same email:
> One should be very, very circumspect about presuming to know better than
> SQL
It's a choice. I understand and respect R's. But I can also understand why
someone might have expected something different.
S
*******************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential. Any use...{{dropped:8}}
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
