If I understand correctly, no looping (ave(), for()) or type casting
(as.character()) is needed -- indexing and matching suffice:

> with(df, ID[!ID %in% unique(ID[samples %in% c("B","C") ])])
[1] 3 3



Cheers,

Bert


Bert Gunter

"The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along
and sticking things into it."
-- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip )


On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 8:54 AM, David Winsemius <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 15, 2017, at 4:01 AM, Andras Farkas via R-help <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> wonder if you could please assist with the following
>>
>> df<-data.frame(ID=c(1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5),samples=c("A","B","C","A","C","A","D","C","B","A","C"))
>>
>> from this data frame the goal is to extract the value of 3 from the ID 
>> column based on the logic that the ID=3 in the data frame has NO row that 
>> would pair 3 with either "B", AND/OR "C" in the samples column...
>>
>
> This returns a vector that determines if either of those characters are in 
> the character values of that factor column you created. Coercing to character 
> is needed because leaving samples as a factor generated an invalid factor 
> level warning and gave useless results.
>
>  with( df, ave( as.character(samples), ID, FUN=function(x) {!any(x %in% 
> c("B","C"))}))
>  [1] "FALSE" "FALSE" "FALSE" "FALSE" "FALSE" "TRUE"  "TRUE"  "FALSE" "FALSE"
> [10] "FALSE" "FALSE"
>
> You can then use it to extract and consolidate to a single value (although 
> wrapping with as.logical was needed because `ave` returned character class 
> values):
>
>  unique( df$ID[ as.logical(   # fails without this since "FALSE" != FALSE
>                     with( df,
>                        ave( as.character(samples), ID, FUN=function(x) 
> {!any(x %in% c("B","C"))})))
>               ] )
> #[1] 3
>
> The same sort of logic could also be constructed with a for-loop:
>
>> for (x in unique(df$ID) ) { if ( !any( df$samples[df$ID==x] %in% c("b","C")) 
>> ) print(x) }
> [1] 3
>
> Although you are warned that for-loops do not return values and you might 
> need to make an assignment rather than just printing.
>
> --
>
> David Winsemius
> Alameda, CA, USA
>
> ______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to