Many thanks for the assistance.  I am using a small sample of GUSTO-1 as a 
teaching demonstration.  The Gusto-1 dataset in various smaller subsets is 
available from this website: 
http://clinicalpredictionmodels.org/doku.php?id=rcode_and_data:start  which is 
associated with the Clinical Prediction Models book by Steyerberg.

Many thanks again for your assistance.

Kind regards,
Laura

From: harre...@gmail.com [mailto:harre...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Frank Harrell
Sent: 14 September 2017 17:22
To: David Winsemius <dwinsem...@comcast.net>
Cc: Bonnett, Laura <ljbcm...@liverpool.ac.uk>; r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] Help understanding why glm and lrm.fit runs with my data, but 
lrm does not

Fixed 'maxiter' in the help file.  Thanks.

Please give the original source of that dataset.

That dataset is a tiny sample of GUSTO-I and not large enough to fit this model 
very reliably.

A nomogram using the full dataset (not publicly available to my knowledge) is 
already available in http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/tmp/bbr.pdf

Use lrm, not lrm.fit for this.  Adding maxit=20 will probably make it work on 
the small dataset but still not clear on why you are using this dataset.

Frank


________________________________
Frank E Harrell Jr

Professor

School of Medicine


Department of Biostatistics

Vanderbilt University


On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:48 AM, David Winsemius 
<dwinsem...@comcast.net<mailto:dwinsem...@comcast.net>> wrote:

> On Sep 14, 2017, at 12:30 AM, Bonnett, Laura 
> <l.j.bonn...@liverpool.ac.uk<mailto:l.j.bonn...@liverpool.ac.uk>> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I am using the publically available GustoW dataset.  The exact version I am 
> using is available here: 
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdrive.google.com%2Fopen%3Fid%3D0B4oZ2TQA0PAoUm85UzBFNjZ0Ulk&data=02%7C01%7Cf.harrell%40vanderbilt.edu%7Cadb58b13c3994f89209708d4fb8807f0%7Cba5a7f39e3be4ab3b45067fa80faecad%7C0%7C0%7C636410009046132507&sdata=UZgX3%2Ba%2FU2Eeh8ybHMI6JnF0Npd2XJPXAzlmtEhDgOY%3D&reserved=0
>
> I would like to produce a nomogram for 5 covariates - AGE, HYP, KILLIP, HRT 
> and ANT.  I have successfully fitted a logistic regression model using the 
> "glm" function as shown below.
>
> library(rms)
> gusto <- spss.get("GustoW.sav")
> fit <- 
> glm(DAY30~AGE+HYP+factor(KILLIP)+HRT+ANT,family=binomial(link="logit"),data=gusto,x=TRUE,y=TRUE)
>
> However, my review of the literature and other websites suggest I need to use 
> "lrm" for the purposes of producing a nomogram.  When I run the command using 
> "lrm" (see below) I get an error message saying:
> Error in lrm(DAY30 ~ AGE + HYP + KILLIP + HRT + ANT, gusto2) :
>  Unable to fit model using "lrm.fit"
>
> My code is as follows:
> gusto2 <- gusto[,c(1,3,5,8,9,10)]
> gusto2$HYP <- factor(gusto2$HYP, labels=c("No","Yes"))
> gusto2$KILLIP <- factor(gusto2$KILLIP, labels=c("1","2","3","4"))
> gusto2$HRT <- factor(gusto2$HRT, labels=c("No","Yes"))
> gusto2$ANT <- factor(gusto2$ANT, labels=c("No","Yes"))
> var.labels=c(DAY30="30-day Mortality", AGE="Age in Years", KILLIP="Killip 
> Class", HYP="Hypertension", HRT="Tachycardia", ANT="Anterior Infarct 
> Location")
> label(gusto2)=lapply(names(var.labels),function(x) 
> label(gusto2[,x])=var.labels[x])
>
> ddist = datadist(gusto2)
> options(datadist='ddist')
>
> fit1 <- lrm(DAY30~AGE+HYP+KILLIP+HRT+ANT,gusto2)
>
> Error in lrm(DAY30 ~ AGE + HYP + KILLIP + HRT + ANT, gusto2) :
>  Unable to fit model using "lrm.fit"
>
> Online solutions to this problem involve checking whether any variables are 
> redundant.  However, the results for my data suggest  that none are.
> redun(~AGE+HYP+KILLIP+HRT+ANT,gusto2)
>
> Redundancy Analysis
>
> redun(formula = ~AGE + HYP + KILLIP + HRT + ANT, data = gusto2)
>
> n: 2188         p: 5    nk: 3
>
> Number of NAs:   0
>
> Transformation of target variables forced to be linear
>
> R-squared cutoff: 0.9   Type: ordinary
>
> R^2 with which each variable can be predicted from all other variables:
>
>   AGE    HYP KILLIP    HRT    ANT
> 0.028  0.032  0.053  0.046  0.040
>
> No redundant variables
>
> I've also tried just considering "lrm.fit" and that code seems to run without 
> error too:
> lrm.fit(cbind(gusto2$AGE,gusto2$KILLIP,gusto2$HYP,gusto2$HRT,gusto2$ANT),gusto2$DAY30)
>
> Logistic Regression Model
>
> lrm.fit(x = cbind(gusto2$AGE, gusto2$KILLIP, gusto2$HYP, gusto2$HRT,
>     gusto2$ANT), y = gusto2$DAY30)
>
>                       Model Likelihood     Discrimination    Rank Discrim.
>                          Ratio Test           Indexes           Indexes
> Obs          2188    LR chi2     233.59    R2       0.273    C       0.846
>  0           2053    d.f.             5    g        1.642    Dxy     0.691
>  1            135    Pr(> chi2) <0.0001    gr       5.165    gamma   0.696
> max |deriv| 4e-09                          gp       0.079    tau-a   0.080
>                                            Brier    0.048
>
>           Coef     S.E.   Wald Z Pr(>|Z|)
> Intercept -13.8515 0.9694 -14.29 <0.0001
> x[1]        0.0989 0.0103   9.58 <0.0001
> x[2]        0.9030 0.1510   5.98 <0.0001
> x[3]        1.3576 0.2570   5.28 <0.0001
> x[4]        0.6884 0.2034   3.38 0.0007
> x[5]        0.6327 0.2003   3.16 0.0016
>
> I was therefore hoping someone would explain why the "lrm" code is producing 
> an error message, while "lrm.fit" and "glm" do not.  In particular I would 
> welcome a solution to ensure I can produce a nomogram.

Try this:

lrm  # look at code, do a search on "fail"
?lrm.fit  # read the structure of the returned value of lrm.fit

my.fit <- lrm.fit(x = cbind(gusto2$AGE, gusto2$KILLIP, gusto2$HYP, gusto2$HRT,
    gusto2$ANT), y = gusto2$DAY30)

print(my.fit$fail)  # the error message you got from the lrm call means 
convergence failed

Documentation bug: The documentation of the cause of the 'fail'- value 
incorrectly gives the name of this parameter as 'maxiter' in the  Value section.

--
David.



>
> Kind regards,
> Laura
>
> Dr Laura Bonnett
> NIHR Post-Doctoral Fellow
>
> Department of Biostatistics,
> Waterhouse Building, Block F,
> 1-5 Brownlow Street,
> University of Liverpool,
> Liverpool,
> L69 3GL
>
> 0151 795 9686
> l.j.bonn...@liverpool.ac.uk<mailto:l.j.bonn...@liverpool.ac.uk>
>
>
>
>       [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org<mailto:R-help@r-project.org> mailing list -- To 
> UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstat.ethz.ch%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fr-help&data=02%7C01%7Cf.harrell%40vanderbilt.edu%7Cadb58b13c3994f89209708d4fb8807f0%7Cba5a7f39e3be4ab3b45067fa80faecad%7C0%7C0%7C636410009046132507&sdata=GAPis8GXCfundLz48dX66AZfVTzxs%2BNBUmG1kgpx2Ro%3D&reserved=0
> PLEASE do read the posting guide 
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.R-project.org%2Fposting-guide.html&data=02%7C01%7Cf.harrell%40vanderbilt.edu%7Cadb58b13c3994f89209708d4fb8807f0%7Cba5a7f39e3be4ab3b45067fa80faecad%7C0%7C0%7C636410009046132507&sdata=C8xd7UizYeLM6bylOyad8bumQTsYOzFYZu2IcMo%2BUII%3D&reserved=0
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

David Winsemius
Alameda, CA, USA

'Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.'   
-Gehm's Corollary to Clarke's Third Law






        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to