> On May 5, 2018, at 1:19 AM, Troels Ring <tr...@gvdnet.dk> wrote:
>
> Dear friends - I'm having troubles with nlme fitting a simplified model as
> shown below eliciting the error
>
> Error in chol.default((value + t(value))/2) :
> the leading minor of order 1 is not positive definite -
>
> I have seen the threads on this error but it didn't help me solve the problem.
>
> The model runs well in brms and identifies the used parameters even with
> fixed effects for TRT - but here in nlme TRT is ignored and I guess this is
> not the reason for the said error
>
> Below is the quite clumsy simulated data set and specification of call to
> nlme - the start values are taken from fitted values in brms
>
> library(ggplot2)
> windows(record=TRUE)
> #generate 3*10 rats - add fixed effects to the four parameters according to
> the three groups - add random effects pr each rat - add residual random effect
> #Parameter values taken from Sapirstein AJP 181:330-6, 1955
>
>
> set.seed(1234)
> Time <- seq(1,60,by=1)
> A <- 275; B <- 140; g1 <- 0.1105; g2 <- .0161
>
> N <- 30
>
> AA <- rep(A,30)+rnorm(30,0,30);BB <- rep(B,30)+rnorm(30,0,15) ;
> gg1 <- rep(g1,30)+rnorm(30,0,0.01); gg2 <- rep(g2,30)+rnorm(30,0,0.001)
>
> TRT <- gl(3,10*60)
> levels(TRT) <- c("CTRL","DIAB","HYPER")
> AA1 <- AA + c(rep(0,10),rep(10,10),rep(-10,10))
> BB1 <- BB + c(rep(0,10),rep(5,10),rep(-5,10))
> Gg1 <- gg1 + c(rep(0,10),rep(0.01,10),rep(-0.01,10))
> Gg2 <- gg2 + c(rep(0,10),rep(0.005,10),rep(-0.005,10))
>
> getY <- function(A,B,g1,g2) {
> Y <- A*exp(-g1*Time) + B*exp(-g2*Time)
> Y <- Y + rnorm(60,0,20)
> }
> YY <- c()
> for (i in 1:N) YY <- c(YY,getY(AA1[i],BB1[i],Gg1[i],Gg2[i]))
> TT <- rep(Time,N)
> RAT <- gl(N,length(Time))
> dats <- data.frame(RAT,TRT,TT,YY)
> Dats <- dats
> names(Dats)[c(3,4)] <- c("Time","Y")
> dput(Dats,"dats0505.dat")
>
> with(Dats,plot(Time,Y,pch=19,cex=.1,col=TRT))
> ggplot(data=Dats,aes(x=Time,y=Y,group=RAT,col=TRT)) + geom_line()
>
> library(nlme)
>
> gfr.nlme <- nlme(Y ~ A*exp(-Time*g1)+B*exp(-Time*g2),
> data = Dats,
> fixed = A+g1+B+g2 ~1,
> random = A+g1+B+g2 ~1,groups = ~ RAT,
Your fixed and random formulae look the same. That would seem to create
problems, at leas the way I understand mixed models analysis. At any rate this
is much more likely to get expert eyes (which mine definitely are not) on the
problem if it were posted to the mixed models list.
> start = c(255,115,130*1e-3,17*1e-3),
> na.action = na.omit,verbose=TRUE,control = list(msVerbose = TRUE))
> summary(gfr.nlme)
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
David Winsemius
Alameda, CA, USA
'Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.'
-Gehm's Corollary to Clarke's Third Law
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
