This could possibly be a botched attempt at telling "the system" that one could
use proportion() as synonymous with mean(). That would obviously fail due to
scoping rules, but maybe an earlier version used <<- (?). Anyways, you could
take the hint: proportions are just means of 0-1 variables...
> On 26 Nov 2018, at 01:06 , David Winsemius <dwinsem...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> The code in the function you are asking about does begin with:
>
> {
>
> proportion <- mean
>
> However, that named entity, `proportion`, is never referenced in code that
> follows, so it appears that the package author started down one path and then
> abandoned that line of code and did something else.
--
Peter Dalgaard, Professor,
Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Phone: (+45)38153501
Office: A 4.23
Email: pd....@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
