This could possibly be a botched attempt at telling "the system" that one could use proportion() as synonymous with mean(). That would obviously fail due to scoping rules, but maybe an earlier version used <<- (?). Anyways, you could take the hint: proportions are just means of 0-1 variables...
> On 26 Nov 2018, at 01:06 , David Winsemius <[email protected]> wrote: > > The code in the function you are asking about does begin with: > > { > > proportion <- mean > > However, that named entity, `proportion`, is never referenced in code that > follows, so it appears that the package author started down one path and then > abandoned that line of code and did something else. -- Peter Dalgaard, Professor, Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Office: A 4.23 Email: [email protected] Priv: [email protected] ______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
