Michael Styer wrote: >> So my next question is, does anyone have any thoughts about how significant >> a project it would be to compile R for 64-bit windows (using, e.g., the >> Portland Group >> compiler)?
Based on our experiences at REvolution Computing, it's quite a significant project. We're the commercial company Peter Dalgaard alluded to last week (thanks for the advertising, Peter!) that is working on the port. It's taken quite a while, but we expect to have REvolution R for Windows 64-bit available for beta testing in January. If you (or anyone else) is interested in beta testing on Windows 64-bit please let me know. When it's released our 64-bit binary will come with a paid support contract but as Peter mentioned we'll be submitting the changes back to r-core and (assuming they're incorporated) you can try compiling it yourself at that point. We have found that there are idiosyncrasies amongst the different compilers and configurations on the Windows 64-bit platform; we're using the Intel compiler and your mileage may well vary with others. # David Smith -- David M Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Director of Community, REvolution Computing www.revolution-computing.com Tel: +1 (206) 577-4778 x3203 (Seattle, USA) ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.