Hello everyone,
Â
I am a very new user of R and I have a query about the cuminc function in the
package cmprsk. In particular I would like to verify that I am interpreting the
output correctly when we have a stratification variable.
Â
Hypothetical example:
Â
group : fair hair, dark hair
fstatus: 1=Relapse, 2=TRM, 0=censored
strata: sex (M or F)
Â
Our data would be split into:
Â
Fair, male, relapse
Dark,male, relapse
Fair, female, relapse
Dark, female, relapse
Â
Fair, male, TRM
Dark,male, TRM
Fair, female, TRM
Dark, female, TRM
Â
Fair, male, censored
Dark,male, censored
Fair, female, censored
Dark, female, censored
Â
Am I correct in thinking that the 2 "Tests" which will be printed by R tell us
(i) if there are significant differences between those with fair hair and those
with dark hair as regards cumulative incidence of relapse [taking into account
sex differences] (ii) if there are significant differences between those with
fair hair and those with dark hair as regards cumulative incidence of TRM
[taking into account sex differences] ? The âestâand âvarâvalues are
the same regardless of whether we include a stratification variable or not.
Â
If we do not include a stratification variable the âtestsâ results will be
different to those when a stratification variable is included and they test (i)
if there are significant differences between those with fair hair and those
with dark hair as regards cumulative incidence of relapse (ii) if there are
significant differences between those with fair hair and those with dark hair
as regards cumulative incidence of TRM.
Â
Just thought Iâd double check.
Many thanks,
Kim
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.