Cliff Behrens-3 wrote:
>
> For future reference, am
> I to assume that no contributed packages should be implicated in
> resolving a problem?
>
>
It does bring things one step closer to "minimal, reproducible".
If you can identify the problem as specifically involving the package,
then it's still OK to query the general R list, but it's generally a
good idea to Cc: the package maintainer as well.
Ben Bolker
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Problem-assigning-%22NA%22-as-a-level-name-in-a-list-tp21036232p21039112.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
