On 21/01/2009, at 12:26 PM, Czerminski, Ryszard wrote:

Passing extra arguments to FUN=mean or median in apply
seems fine, but when FUN=min warnings are generated?
See below.

Any ideas why?

Best regards,
Ryszard

Ryszard Czerminski
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP

m
     [,1] [,2]
[1,]    1    2
[2,]    3   NA
[3,]   NA   NA
apply(m, 1, median, na.rm=T)
[1] 1.5 3.0  NA
apply(m, 1, mean, na.rm=T)
[1] 1.5 3.0 NaN
apply(m, 1, min, na.rm=T)
[1]   1   3 Inf
Warning message:
In FUN(newX[, i], ...) : no non-missing arguments to min; returning Inf

RTFM:

     The minimum and maximum of a numeric empty set are '+Inf' and
     '-Inf' (in this order!) which ensures _transitivity_, e.g.,
     'min(x1, min(x2)) == min(x1, x2)'.  For numeric 'x' 'max(x) ==
     -Inf' and 'min(x) == +Inf' whenever 'length(x) == 0' (after
     removing missing values if requested).

        cheers,

                Rolf Turner

######################################################################
Attention:\ This e-mail message is privileged and confid...{{dropped:9}}

______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to