Thanks for this advice - and to second Gabor's experience: I just
tried it on a couple of my files and achieved reductions on the order
of 90% (28.6MB to 4.4MB and 1.5GB to 170MB)!
This file contains lots of small plots but also many scattersmooth()-
images ...
So I think it does quite well in my case.
Benno
Am 30.Jul.2009 um 12:21 schrieb Gabor Grothendieck:
> I just tried it with a recent pdf that was generated from R on
> Windows Vista
> with "R version 2.9.1 Patched (2009-07-16 r48939)". This particular
> one
> was laden with many graphs and was reduced to 25% of the original
> size so my experience with that one was that it made a huge
> difference.
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:59 AM, David
> Keegan<david.kee...@shenick.com> wrote:
>> Gabor,
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestion. I tried pdftk but it made very
>> little difference.
>>
>> Regards,
>> David.
>> --
>> [David Keegan david.kee...@shenick.com 353 1 2710818]
>> Gabor Grothendieck writes:
>> > After generating the pdf try this using the free pdftk utilty:
>> >
>> > pdftk infile.pdf output outfile.pdf compress
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:13 AM, David Keegan<david.kee...@shenick.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
