On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Moumita Das wrote:

Hi All,
There were lot of diffrences in the R and SPSS results for Exploratory
Factor Analysis.why is it so ?I used standard factor analysis functions
like:--

factanal(m, factors=3, rotation="varimax")
princomp(m, cor = FALSE, scores = TRUE, subset = rep(TRUE,
nrow(as.matrix(m))))
print(summary(princomp(m, cor=TRUE),loadings = TRUE, cutoff = 0.2), digits =
2)
prcomp(m, scale = TRUE)
summary(pc.cr <- princomp(m, cor=TRUE))

I just do coding in R ,but my statistician said teh results vary a lot.I
found quite a number of posts regarding this issue in these links:--
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2003-May/033299.html
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2003-May/033361.html
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2003-May/033361.html
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2003-May/033299.html
http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/help/03a/5100.html

That thread is from six years ago. R has changed since that time, and even SPSS might have changed. Also, it if you read the thread you see that the SPSS and R principal component output just differ by a scale factor on each column of the loadings matrix, which is only defined up to a scale factor. That is, the R and SPSS results actually do agree for principal components.

The factor analysis output may well be different. As the documentation for 
factanal() says:
"There are so many variations on factor analysis that it is hard to compare output from different programs. Further, the optimization in maximum likelihood factor analysis is hard, and many other examples we compared had less good fits than produced by this function. In particular, solutions which are Heywood cases (with one or more uniquenesses essentially zero) are much often common than most texts and some other programs would lead one to believe."

If SPSS and R are fitting the same factor analysis model you can compare the fitted likelihood to see which package has found a better solution.

      -thomas

Thomas Lumley                   Assoc. Professor, Biostatistics
[email protected]        University of Washington, Seattle

______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to