Fantastic. You're much more likely to get a response now. Best of luck. "werner w" <pensterfuz...@yahoo.de> wrote in message news:1264175935970-1100164.p...@n4.nabble.com... > > Thanks Matthew, you are absolutely right. > > I am working on Windows XP SP2 32bit with R versions 2.9.1. > > Here is an example: > d <- as.data.frame(matrix(trunc(rnorm(6*27136, 10000, 100)),ncol=6)) > d[,4:5] <- trunc(100*runif(2*27136, 0, 1)) > d[,6] <- trunc(1000*runif(27136, 0, 1)) > for (i in 4:6) d[,i] <- as.factor(d[,i]) > lm(V1 ~ log(V2) + log(V3) + V4 + V5 + V6, data=d) > memory.size(max=F) > memory.size(max=T) > > I managed to get it run through after setting the 3GB switch for Windows > and > with a clean R session. > I also noticed later, that after removing na.action=na.exclude more > regressions run through. > > But before and after the lm() it seems there should be enough memory which > means that lm() builds up some quite large objects during its > computations? > -- > View this message in context: > http://n4.nabble.com/Once-again-Error-cannot-allocate-vector-of-size-tp1083506p1100164.html > Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
