Bert, I like your comments. There is one issue, however, that drives me crazy whenever I meet a customer asking "You are not using SAS? Too bad, we need validated results."
Bert Gunter wrote: > > ... > Also to reiterate, it's not only > statistical/reporting functionality but even more the integration into the > existing clinical database systems that would have to be rewritten **and > validated**. > > Implicitly: Even if you let your cat enter SAS code, the results are correct, because they SAS is validated. Dieter -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Use-of-R-in-clinical-trials-tp1559402p1561317.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
