Yeah that's right; in that case implementing the print.myclass as you say
would be the best option.
Miguel
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Dieter Menne
<dieter.me...@menne-biomed.de>wrote:
>
>
> Miguel Porto wrote:
> >
> > Hmm... do something like that, no need to change the global option (I
> used
> > a
> > named vector instead of a list, it's more convenient):
> >
> > eg <- function(x, digits=4) {
> > xbar <- mean(x)
> > sdx <- sd(x)
> > value <- c(xbar, sdx)
> > names(value) <- c("Mean of X", "SD of X")
> > print(round(value,digits));
> > return(invisible(value))}
> >
> >
>
> Would be ok, but Josh explicitly had no print in the function, so one could
> assume that he wanted full control.
>
> Dieter
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n4.nabble.com/Return-one-value-print-another-tp1590248p1590563.html
> Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
