Just a small correction to what I've said ... see below >>>>> "MM" == Martin Maechler <maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch> >>>>> on Tue, 18 May 2010 10:00:20 +0200 writes:
>>>>> David Winsemius <dwinsem...@comcast.net> >>>>> on Mon, 17 May 2010 17:44:00 -0400 writes: >> On May 17, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Adam November wrote: >>> I believe I'm working with the newest version of R >>> (2.11.0) and I've tried a few of the most recent >>> versions... No luck yet. >> Luck has nothing to do with it. What part of ERROR in the >> CRAN package check for the current version of lme4 with >> the Mac R 2.11.0 don't you understand? Packages that >> generate errors are not made available as binaries. >> I was giving you advice about how to deal with the stated >> difficulty with installing lme4 from source using the >> older versions of R. Only if you want to revert to 2.10.1 >> and install a prior version for lme4 would my advice be >> helpful. >> -- >> David. MM> Doug Bates and I had recently been contacted by another Mac user MM> about this. MM> Doug advised him to install lme4 from the sources and MM> he was immediately successful. MM> In the light of this, I'm a bit puzzled about the harsh words MM> David is using with respect to the "cohabitation" of R 2.11.0 MM> and lme4. MM> Simultaneously, we have been in contact with Simon Urbanek MM> trying to investigate why the 'R CMD check' tests fail on OSX MM> (http://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-release-macosx-ix86/lme4-00check.html) MM> A conclusion/solution has not been found yet, MM> but as I said above, the advice to install from the source MM> install.packages("lme4", type = "source") The following is not true. There is basically no caveat here. Yesterday I had managed to *not* get lme4 to install because I had too many directories called 'Matrix' "lying around" which confused package installation for lme4 when it was looking for the Matrix header files. This should never happen to "normal" people ... Martin MM> One possible caveat -- as lme4 uses the C API of Matrix (including MM> the C header ("include") files it exports) -- MM> is that for the above way of installation, MM> you need to install into the (or "a") library where Matrix is MM> installed. MM> For those who only use one library, this will not be MM> a concern. Others could use the fact that MacOSX is a kind of Unix MM> and you can simply "symlink" Matrix (from the R standard MM> library) into the library into which you want to install lme4 MM> { cd <mylibrary> MM> ln -s `R RHOME`/library/Matrix . MM> } MM> Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich >>> Thanks, -Adam >>> >>> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 1:51 PM, David Winsemius >>> <dwinsem...@comcast.net > wrote: >>>> >>>> On May 17, 2010, at 4:44 PM, Adam November wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi All, Just thought I'd bring attention to the fact >>>>> that lme4 is failing cran checks on the mac platform, >>>>> and I can't seem to install it from source on 10.5 or >>>>> 10.6, either ("ld: library not found for -lgfortran ") >>>>> . Any help getting this working? Thanks! >>>> >>>> You would not expect the current package to install >>>> properly with earlier versions of r. Find the >>>> appropriate version at the archive: >>>> >>>> http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Archive/lme4/ >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> David Winsemius, MD West Hartford, CT MM> ______________________________________________ MM> R-help@r-project.org mailing list MM> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help MM> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html MM> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.