On Fri, 24-Jan-2003 at 01:23PM -0600, Deepayan Sarkar wrote: |> On Friday 24 January 2003 10:54 am, Wolfram Fischer - Z/I/M wrote: |> > [ R 1.6.1 ] |> > |> > PROBLEM |> > The plot of the appended code does produce |> > a postscript file which is not interpretable |> > by gv under Linux. |> |> The srt vector has several NA's. x11() does not draw these, which may or may |> not be what you want. You should be able to reproduce that in postscript() |> with an additional subset = !is.na(Solar.R) argument to xyplot().
Is there a simple reason why x11 doesn't require the !is.na() whereas postscript does? It took me an hour or more to work out what was happening when I had a similar problem. best -- Patrick Connolly HortResearch Mt Albert Auckland New Zealand Ph: +64-9 815 4200 x 7188 ~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~ I have the world`s largest collection of seashells. I keep it on all the beaches of the world ... Perhaps you`ve seen it. ---Steven Wright ~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~ ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
