I'm working on a rather interesting consulting problem with a client. A number of physical variables are measured on a number of cricket bowlers in the performance of a delivery. An example variable might be a directional component of angular momentum for a particular joint measured at a large number (101) of equally spaced timepoints.

Each bowler generates a (fairly smooth) curve for each variable measured. I decided to represent each curve by a few orthogonal polynomial constrasts.

There are 4 groups of bowlers corresponding to various speeds of delivery. I want to use canonical variant analysis to find linear combinations of my transformed variables discriminating well between the groups of bowlers.

I used lda() from the MASS library to do this, but examining the output I notice that the higher-order orthogonal polynomials are getting larger coefficients than the more important lower-order ones. This is clearly because some scaling of the variables is being done by lda(), and because the higher-order polynomial vaiable values are smaller, they are scaled up.

I would like to turn off this scaling as it is not what is needed in this problem and will cause the tail to "wag the dog". There is no obvious parameter to do this in

lda(x, grouping, prior = proportions, tol = 1.0e-4,
subset, na.action = na.fail,
method, CV = FALSE, nu)

so I thought that I might try a hack. However:

> lda
function (x, ...)
{
if (is.null(class(x)))
class(x) <- data.class(x)
UseMethod("lda", x, ...)
}

which isn't very helpful.

Any ideas about how to perform an unscaled canonical variates analysis?

Cheers,

Murray
--
Dr Murray Jorgensen http://www.stats.waikato.ac.nz/Staff/maj.html
Department of Statistics, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax 7 838 4155
Phone +64 7 838 4773 wk +64 7 849 6486 home Mobile 021 1395 862

______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help

Reply via email to