"David Andel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi > > As Dirk said before, if you're running unstable, the official > version is surely the best. If you're running testing though, you're > probably better off using the apt sources listed in > http://cran.us.r-project.org/bin/linux/debian/ReadMe since there are > some dependency hassles with installing the unstable version on > testing (at least I got tired of going through all the dependency > stuff). >
BTW, is there a good reason to keep the "testing" distribution at 1.6.0? I would assume that at least you'd want to include patches up to 1.6.2 rather than ship a version with known bugs. Not wanting to get into the 1.7.x series is understandable, of course. -- O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3 c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) FAX: (+45) 35327907 ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
