On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Philippe Hup� wrote:I have done the same thing under Debian/sid wiht R1.7.1 and it takes almost 0 second !! Then, is there any problem with winXP ?
Andrew C. Ward a �crit :
Dear Philippe,I have a computer with 3GHz processor (Pentium IV) and 2 Go of RAM so I don't think this is a matter of computer performance :).
Perhaps you could try a different graphics device (maybe postscript). On my machine, the time differences were all 1 second rather than the 3 you reported.If 300s is really too long for you, you could get a new computer or run your script on a faster one.
My lowly 1.4GHz P4M laptop does it in 2.5 secs, so there does seem to be a performance problem with your computer.
BTW, the way to time a command is to use system.time()
Andrew C. Ward
CAPE Centre Department of Chemical Engineering The University of Queensland Brisbane Qld 4072 Australia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Philippe Hup� <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
hello,.
I use R1.7.1 under winXP and I am running the following script example :
for (i in 1:10)
{
x <- rnorm(100)
png( paste("D:/essai",i,".png",sep=""))
plot(x)
t1 <- Sys.time()
dev.off()
t2 <- Sys.time()
print(t2-t1)
}
at each step, it takes about 3 seconds to shut down the
graphic device. I want to generate about one hundred of image and of
course it takes too much time. Is there any trick ?
Philippe
______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
--
--------------------------------------------------
Philippe Hup� Institut Curie - Equipe Bioinformatique 26, rue d'Ulm - 75005 PARIS France +33 (0)1 42 34 65 29
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
