thanks for this. What I should have asked is, should one always report
repeatable seg faults (even if functions are called with inappropriate arguments)?
[the emacs bug report FAQ says "yes" but I don't think there is a similar policy for R].
best
rksh
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Robin Hankin wrote:
Hello everybody.
I've been experimenting with mapply(). Does anyone else have problems with:
R> mapply(rep,times=1:4, MoreArgs=42)
(I get a seg fault).
Yes, thanks for reporting this.
You should get an error message instead: the correct syntax would be mapply(rep, times=1:4, MoreArgs=list(42))
It looks as though just coercing to a list would probably be sufficient.
-thomas
______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
