Hello Simon,

--On woensdag 15 oktober 2003 10:08 +0100 Simon Fear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

By the way, `is.na(x) <- FALSE` will leave x unchanged (including
leaving it as NA ! how bad is that ?!)

Twilight Zone (Golden Earring). But with that remark I'm getting off topic, so thank you for your summary. I've already memorized the is.na() construct, so I should be safe for the time being :>

kind regards,
Paul



--
Paul Lemmens
NICI, University of Nijmegen              ASCII Ribbon Campaign /"\
Montessorilaan 3 (B.01.03)                    Against HTML Mail \ /
NL-6525 HR Nijmegen                                              X
The Netherlands                                                 / \
Phonenumber    +31-24-3612648
Fax            +31-24-3616066

______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help

Reply via email to